Steam Machines are slower gaming systems than Windows PCs
The whole point of a Steam Machine is to get PC-like gaming in your living room, but do you actually get PC-like performance? Not so much, if you ask Ars Technica. It recently ran benchmarks comparing the performance of SteamOS and Windows 10 on the same hardware, and it’s pretty clear that you’re taking a speed hit in the name of couch-based convenience. The two operating systems are very close in synthetic tests, but SteamOS lags well behind Windows when it comes to real gameplay: depending on the game and your detail settings, you could be losing dozens of frames per second. All of the titles tested were still very playable on the modest test rig (a dual-core 3GHz Pentium with an old GeForce GTX 660), but this could pose a problem with more demanding titles in the future.
Why the discrepancy? Simply put, it’s a matter of optimization. Video card drivers and games tend not to be as fine-tuned for Linux (the foundation of SteamOS) as they are for Windows, where most PC gamers play — the software is preventing the hardware from reaching its potential. That could change if Steam Machines catch on and push developers to refine their code. For now, though, you’ll have to accept that your living room gaming rig isn’t quite as fast as the PC in your den.
Valve
SteamOS
Key specs
Prices
Discussions
Type
Computer OS
Source model
Closed, w/ open source
Architecture
64-bit, 32-bit
Announced
2013-09-23
see all specs →
Microsoft
Windows 10
Originally posted here: Steam Machines are slower gaming systems than Windows PCs
